- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1036/23: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola v EUIPO – Pastificio Lucio Garofalo (fattorie garofalo) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark FATTORIE GAROFALO – Earlier EU figurative mark GAROFALO – Relative ground for refusal – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark – No due cause)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA1036
62023TA1036
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4152
4.8.2025
(Case T-1036/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark FATTORIE GAROFALO - Earlier EU figurative mark GAROFALO - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - No due cause)
(C/2025/4152)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Fattorie Garofalo – Società Cooperativa Agricola (Capua, Italy) (represented by: S. Cutolo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Pastificio Lucio Garofalo SpA (Gragnano, Italy)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 August 2023 (Case R 2138/2022–4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2023/1175, 4.12.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4152/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—