- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-529/14: Action brought on 14 July 2014 — adp Gauselmann v OHIM (Multi Win)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0529
62014TN0529
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.9.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 303/53
(Case T-529/14)
2014/C 303/63
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2014 in Case R 1326/2013-1;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Multi Win’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 2 06 364
Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No. 207/2009