EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-323/25: Action brought on 23 May 2025 – Avetisyan v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0323

62025TN0323

May 23, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/3914

21.7.2025

(Case T-323/25)

(C/2025/3914)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Vladimir Avetisyan (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: A. Genko and É. Épron, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should

find the present application for annulment to be admissible and well founded;

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/528 of 14 March 2025 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/527 of 14 March 2025 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine in so far as they concern Mr Vladimir Avetisyan;

order the Council of the European Union to pay the applicant EUR 192 480 pursuant to Articles 268 and 340 TFEU;

order the Council of the European Union to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging an error of assessment. The applicant submits that the restrictive measure concerning him is based on outdated information. According to him, the Council failed to take into consideration duly established new circumstances demonstrating that the factual circumstances that justified the initial inclusion of his name have ceased to exist.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3914/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia