- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-397/10: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2011 — ara v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Failure to submit the statement of grounds of appeal to the Board of Appeal within the prescribed time-limit Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting an application of the full re-establishment of the applicant's rights — Action manifestly lacking a legal basis)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0397
62010TB0397
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
(Case T-397/10)
(Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Failure to submit the statement of grounds of appeal to the Board of Appeal within the prescribed time-limit Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting an application of the full re-establishment of the applicant's rights - Action manifestly lacking a legal basis)
2011/C 331/42
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Allrounder SARL (Sarrebourg, France)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2010 (Case R 1543/2009-1) concerning the applicant's application for full re-establishment of its rights
Operative part of the order
1.The application is dismissed as manifestly lacking a legal basis.
2.ara AG is ordered to pay the costs.
* * *
(1) OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.