I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-20/15 P and C-21/15 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017053EN.01000401-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017053EN.01000401-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Appeal - State aid - Article 107(1) TFEU - Tax system - Corporation tax - Deduction - Amortisation of goodwill resulting from acquisitions by undertakings resident for tax purposes in Spain of shareholdings of at least 5 % in undertakings resident for tax purposes outside Spain - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Condition relating to selectivity))
(2017/C 053/05)
Language of the case: Spanish
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, B. Stromsky, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: World Duty Free Group SA, formerly Autogrill España SA (C-20/15 P), Banco Santander SA, Santusa Holding SL (C-21/15 P) (represented by: J.L. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and R. Calvo Salinero, abogados)
Interveners in support of the defendants: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents) Ireland (represented by: G. Hodge and E. Creedon, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister, and A. Goodman, Barrister), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.A. Sampol Pucurull, acting as Agent)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgments of the General Court of the European Union of 7 November 2014, <span class="italic">Autogrill España</span> v Commission (T-219/10, EU:T:2014:939), and of 7 November 2014, Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission (T-399/11, EU:T:2014:938);
2.Refers the cases back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs;
4.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017053EN.01000401-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017053EN.01000401-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 81, 9.3.2015)