I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-95/09)(Plant protection products - Active substance napropamide - Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC - Adoption of a subsequent directive - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 362/24
Language of the case: English
Applicant: United Phosphorus Ltd (Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Parpala and N.B. Rasmussen, and subsequently by L. Parpala, acting as Agents, and by J. Stuyck, lawyer)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/902/EC of 7 November 2008 concerning the non-inclusion of napropamide in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance.
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.