EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-7/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 9 January 2020 — VS v Hauptzollamt Münster
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0007
62020CN0007
January 9, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.4.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 137/30
(Case C-7/20)
(2020/C 137/42)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: VS
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Münster
Question referred
Is the second subparagraph of Article 71(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) to be interpreted as meaning that Article 87(4) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 establishing the EU Customs Code (2) can be applied mutatis mutandis to the recovery of VAT (import turnover tax)?
*
OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
*
OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.