- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-332/20: Order of the General Court of 31 May 2021 — König Ludwig International v EUIPO (Royal Bavarian Beer) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Unitary character of the EU trade mark — Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0332
62020TB0332
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 289/37
(Case T-332/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Unitary character of the EU trade mark - Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(2021/C 289/53)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG (Geltendorf, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and J. Stock, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2020 (Case R 1714/2019-4), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Royal Bavarian Beer.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.