I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
29.7.2024
(C/2024/4600)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: EC (represented by: C. Marchand, S. Mary and G. Boye, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Parliament’s decision of 7 March 2024 not to admit the applicant’s request for the defence of the applicant’s immunity, which the applicant was not notified of until the Plenary Session of 11 March 2024;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, that the decision of 7 March 2024, notified on 11 March 2024, declaring inadmissible the request for the defence of the immunities, infringed Rules 9(4) and (9) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, in connection with Article 10 of the Treaty on the European Union and Article 232 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that Parliament’s decision not to admit the request for the defence of the applicant’s immunity of 7 March 2024, breaches articles 6, 39, 41(2)(a) and (c) and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, articles 7, 8 and 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union and article 343 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to have their affairs handled impartially and fairly laid down in Article 41(1) of the Charter, which amounts also to a violation of Article 39(2) of the Charter, and a breach of Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4600/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—