EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-248/24: Action brought on 10 May 2024 – EC v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0248

62024TN0248

May 10, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/4600

29.7.2024

(Case T-248/24)

(C/2024/4600)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: EC (represented by: C. Marchand, S. Mary and G. Boye, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the Parliament’s decision of 7 March 2024 not to admit the applicant’s request for the defence of the applicant’s immunity, which the applicant was not notified of until the Plenary Session of 11 March 2024;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, that the decision of 7 March 2024, notified on 11 March 2024, declaring inadmissible the request for the defence of the immunities, infringed Rules 9(4) and (9) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, in connection with Article 10 of the Treaty on the European Union and Article 232 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that Parliament’s decision not to admit the request for the defence of the applicant’s immunity of 7 March 2024, breaches articles 6, 39, 41(2)(a) and (c) and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, articles 7, 8 and 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union and article 343 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

3.Third plea in law, alleging breach of the right to have their affairs handled impartially and fairly laid down in Article 41(1) of the Charter, which amounts also to a violation of Article 39(2) of the Charter, and a breach of Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4600/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia