EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-425/04, T-444/04, T-450/04 and T-456/04: Judgment of the General Court of 21 May 2010 — France v Commission (State aid — Financial measures in favour of France Télécom — Draft shareholder’s advance — Public declarations by a member of the French Government — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and not ordering its recovery — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Meaning of State Aid — Advantage — State resources — Duty to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62004TA0425

62004TA0425

May 21, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.7.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/28

(Case T-425/04, T-444/04, T-450/04 and T-456/04) (*)

(State aid - Financial measures in favour of France Télécom - Draft shareholder’s advance - Public declarations by a member of the French Government - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and not ordering its recovery - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Meaning of State Aid - Advantage - State resources - Duty to state reasons)

(2010/C 179/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: (in Case T-425/04) French Republic (represented by: initially, G. de Bergues, R. Abraham and S. Ramet, subsequently, E. Belliard, M. de Bergues and S. Ramet and lastly, E. Belliard, M. de Bergues, A.-L. Vendrolini and J.-C. Niollet, Agents); (in Case T-444/04) France Télécom SA (Paris, France) (represented by: initially, A. Gosset-Grainville and S. Hautbourg, subsequently, S. Hautbourg, lawyers); (in Case T-450/04) Bouygues SA (Paris); Bouygues Télécom SA (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: J. Vogel, F. Sureau, D. Théophile and J. Blouet Gaillard, lawyers); and (in Case T-456/04) Association française des opérateurs de réseaux et services de telecommunications (AFORS Télécom) (Paris) (represented by O. Fréget, F. Herrenschmidt, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and J. Buendía Sierra and subsequently C. Giolito and D. Grespan, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: (in Cases T-450/04 and T-456/04) French Republic (represented by: (in Case T-450/04) E. Belliard, M. de Bergues, A.-L. Vendrolini and J.-C Niollet, and (in Case T-456/04) M. de Bergues, Agents); (in Case T-444/04) Bouygues SA (Paris); Bouygues Télécom SA (Boulogne-Billancourt) (represented by: J. Vogel, F. Sureau, D. Théophile and J. Blouet Gaillard, lawyers); and (in Cases T-450/04 and T-456/04) France Télécom SA (Paris) (represented by: initially, A. Gosset-Grainville and S. Hautbourg, subsequently, by S. Hautbourg, lawyers)

Re:

Actions for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/621/EC of 2 August 2004 on the State Aid implemented by France for France Télécom (OJ 2006 L 257, p. 11).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decision 2006/621/EC of 2 August 2004 on the State Aid implemented by France for France Télécom;

2.Declares that it is no longer necessary to adjudicate on the claims for annulment of Article 2 of Decision 2006/621;

3.In Cases T-425/04 and T-444/04, orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the French Republic and by France Télécom SA;

4.In Cases T-425/04 and T-444/04, orders Bouygues SA and Bouygues Télécom SA to bear their own costs;

5.In Cases T-450/04, orders Bouygues SA and Bouygues Télécom SA to bear their own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by the Commission;

6.In Case T-450/04, orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs;

7.In Case T-456/04, orders the Association française des opérateurs de réseaux et services de télécommunications (AFORS Télécom) and the Commission to bear their own costs;

8.In Cases T-450/04 and T-456/04, orders French Republic and France Télécom to bear their own costs.

(*)

Language of the case: French

(1)

OJ C 19, 22.1.2005

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia