I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
30.9.2024
(C/2024/5603)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: TJ
Defendant: Comunidad de Madrid
Other party: Ministerio Fiscal
1.First. Is the case-law which, defending the principles of equality, merit, ability and non-discrimination in the free movement of workers, refuses to confer the status of permanent workers in the public sector on workers who have non-permanent contracts of indefinite duration contrary to Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement?
2.Secondarily. If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative: May entitlement on the part of workers who have non-permanent contracts of indefinite duration to dissuasive compensation when their employment relationship is terminated be regarded as an adequate measure to prevent and, where appropriate, penalise abuses resulting from the use of successive temporary contracts in the public sector, in accordance with Clause 5 of the Framework Agreement?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5603/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—