I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2014/C 303/55
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sheraton International IP LLC (Stamford, United States of America)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 30 April 2014 in Cases R 240/2013-5 and R 303/2013-5 insofar as it concerns Case R 240/2013-5; and
—condemn the Defendant to bear its own and pay the Applicant’s costs.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word elements ‘PARK REGIS’ for services in Classes 35, 36 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 4 88 933
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sheraton International IP LLC
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative and word marks ‘ST. REGIS’ for services in Classes 36, 42 and 43, the international trade mark registration designating the European Union of the word mark ‘ST. REGIS’ for services in Class 36 as well as the well-known figurative and word marks ‘ST. REGIS’ in the European Union
Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was partially upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeals were dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009