- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2012. # Fidelio KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Word mark Hallux - Refusal to register - Absolute ground for refusal - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. # Case C-87/11 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2012:154
62011CO0087
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Word mark Hallux — Refusal to register — Absolute ground for refusal — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case T‑286/08 Fidelio v OHIM, by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 concerning registration of the word sign Hallux as a Community trade mark for certain goods in Classes 10 and 25 (orthopaedic articles and footwear) — Distinctive character of a word sign meaning ‘big toe’ in Latin.
Operative part
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Fidelio KG is ordered to pay the costs.