- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-220/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano — Italy) — XX v OO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State of national health emergency — Continuity of judicial activity — Postponement of hearings — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0220
62020CB0220
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/17
(Case C-220/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State of national health emergency - Continuity of judicial activity - Postponement of hearings - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 79/21)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: XX
Defendant: OO
Interveners: WW, XC, VS
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Giudice di pace di Lanciano (Justice of the Peace of Lanciano, Italy) by decision of 18 May 2020 is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: Italian
* * *
(*) Language of the case: Italian.