- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-4/19: Action brought on 2 January 2019 — Hankintatukku Arno Latvus v EUIPO — Triaz Group (VIVANIA)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0004
62019TN0004
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.2.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 72/41
(Case T-4/19)
(2019/C 72/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hankintatukku Arno Latvus Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Triaz Group GmbH (Freiburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark VIVANIA — European Union trade mark No 11 637 121
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2018 in Case R 767/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reject the request for declaration of invalidity of European Union trade mark No 11 637 121 ‘VIVANIA’;
—order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present procedure.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.