EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-265/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Roma — Italy) — Caffaro Srl v Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale RM/C (Commercial transactions — Directive 2000/35/EC — Combating of late payment — Procedures for recovery of unchallenged claims)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007CA0265

62007CA0265

January 1, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/9

(Case C-265/07)

(Commercial transactions - Directive 2000/35/EC - Combating of late payment - Procedures for recovery of unchallenged claims)

(2008/C 285/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caffaro Srl

Defendant: Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale RM/C

In the presence of: Banca di Roma SpA

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale civile di Roma — Interpretation of Article 5 of Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (OJ 2000 L 200, p. 35) — Recovery procedures for uncontested debts — National legislation laying down that a period of 120 days from the date of notification of the recovery order must elapse before recovery of the debt may be enforced

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions is to be interpreted as not precluding a national provision such as Article 14 of Decree-Law No 669/1996 of 31 December 1996, converted into a law, after amendment, by Law No 30 of 28 February 1997, as amended by Article 147 of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, pursuant to which a creditor in possession of an enforceable title in respect of an unchallenged claim against a public authority as remuneration for a commercial transaction cannot proceed to forced execution against the public authority before a period of 120 days has elapsed since service of the enforceable title on the authority.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia