I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/3868)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: BRANDL Mezőgazdasági, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft.
Defendant: Agrárminisztérium
Must Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that the legislation of a Member State which, following the restoration of a right of usufruct over a plot of agricultural land, which was previously cancelled contrary to EU law, awards the usufructuary financial compensation that does not take into consideration the significant increase in the market value of the properties in respect of which the right of usufruct was cancelled, in the years for which the right was cancelled, is consistent with those articles?
Does the legislation of a Member State which, following the restoration of a right of usufruct over a plot of agricultural land, which was previously cancelled contrary to EU law, awards the usufructuary financial compensation that does not take into consideration the significant increase in the market value of the properties in respect of which the right of usufruct was cancelled, in the years for which the right was cancelled, satisfy the concept of fair compensation contained in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the judgment given in Case C-235/17?
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3868/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—