I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-549/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Agriculture - Export refund - Poultry meat - Fixing the refund at EUR 0 - Obligation to state reasons - Possibility for the Commission to confine itself to a standard set of reasoning - Commission’s standard practice in fixing refunds - Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Non-exhaustive nature of the criteria laid down))
(2016/C 078/25)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and C. Candat, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)
Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultry meat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).
The Court:
1)Dismisses the action;
2)Orders each party to bear its own costs.
*
Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 367, 14.12.2013.