EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-671/22, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 March 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – T GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – EU action in the field of water policy – Directive 2000/60/EC – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Prevention of deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water – Point 1.2.2 of Annex V – Definitions for ‘high’, ‘good’ and ‘moderate’ ecological status in lakes – Criteria for assessing the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0671

62022CA0671

March 21, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/3132

(Case C-671/22,

Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - EU action in the field of water policy - Directive 2000/60/EC - Environmental objectives relating to surface water - Prevention of deterioration of the status of all bodies of surface water - Point 1.2.2 of Annex V - Definitions for ‘high’, ‘good’ and ‘moderate’ ecological status in lakes - Criteria for assessing the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’)

(C/2024/3132)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: T GmbH

Respondent: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Spittal an der Drau

Operative part of the judgment

must be interpreted as meaning that, first, as regards the criteria for assessing the biological quality element ‘fish fauna’, ‘anthropogenic disturbance’, within the meaning of that point, should be understood as any disturbance caused by human activity, including any change capable of affecting the composition and abundance of fish species, and, second, all those disturbances are relevant for the purposes of classifying the ecological status of ‘fish fauna’.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3132/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia