EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-529/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 9 August 2022 — PA v trendtours Touristik GmbH

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0529

62022CN0529

August 9, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.11.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 441/5

(Case C-529/22)

(2022/C 441/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant: PA

Defendant and respondent: trendtours Touristik GmbH

Questions referred

1.Must Article 12(2) of Directive (EU) 2015/2302 (1) of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC (‘the Package Travel Directive’) be interpreted as providing for a further right of termination — in addition to that provided for in Article 12(1) of that directive — the legal consequences of which apply only if the traveller invokes, in his or her declaration of termination, unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination?

2.Must Article 12(2) of the Package Travel Directive be interpreted as meaning that an obligation to pay a termination fee does not cease to apply where the traveller does not state a reason when terminating the package and justifies the termination only subsequently by reference to unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances at the time of termination, this being determined by means of a prognosis, or occurring at the time of travel at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity and significantly affecting the performance of the package, or which significantly affect the carriage of passengers to the destination?

* Language of the case: German.

(1) OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia