- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-40/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Hatherly v EUAA (Civil service — Staff of the EUAA — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Selection procedure for posts of assistants — Job offer — Condition relating to level of post-secondary education attested by a diploma and appropriate professional experience acquired after having obtained the diploma — Withdrawal of job offer — Error of assessment — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0040
62023TA0040
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
C/2024/2302
(Case T-40/23) (1)
(Civil service - Staff of the EUAA - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Selection procedure for posts of assistants - Job offer - Condition relating to level of post-secondary education attested by a diploma and appropriate professional experience acquired after having obtained the diploma - Withdrawal of job offer - Error of assessment - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Liability)
(C/2024/2302)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Xavier James Hatherly (Hamrun, Malta) (represented by: A. Grima, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans, M. Stamatopoulou and D. Testa, acting as Agents, and by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of 8 April 2022 of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) to withdraw the job offer made to him for the post of Administrative Assistant (Selection Procedure EASO/2021/TA/007) and the decision of 3 November 2022 to reject his complaint and, second, compensation for the loss of earnings suffered by him to date.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 127, 11.4.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2302/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)