- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-200/21: Action brought on 29 March 2021 — JS v EDPS
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0200
62021TN0200
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.6.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 217/61
(Case T-200/21)
(2021/C 217/77)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: JS (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the EDPS dated 18 January 2021 rejecting the complaint of the applicant;
—annul also, and so far as necessary, the decision of the EDPS dated 9 March 2021 rejecting the request for review of that initial decision;
—order compensation for the prejudice suffered;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea, alleging breaches of Articles 4(1), 5, 19, 20 and 23 of Regulation No 2018/1725, (1) of the principles of necessity and proportionality, and of Articles 8 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ 2018 L 295, p. 39).