EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-105/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 April 2011 — Scheefer v Parliament (Staff case — Temporary staff — Renewal of a fixed-term contract — Reclassification of a contract for a fixed period as a contract for an indefinite period — First paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FA0105

62009FA0105

April 13, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.8.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/51

(Case F-105/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)

(Staff case - Temporary staff - Renewal of a fixed-term contract - Reclassification of a contract for a fixed period as a contract for an indefinite period - First paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS)

2011/C 252/110

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Séverine Scheefer (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Adam and P. Ketter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Ignătescu and L. Chrétien, then by R. Ignătescu and S. Alves, agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decisions refusing to convert the applicant’s temporary staff contract into a contract for an indefinite period in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS, and application for compensation for the loss suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.annuls the decision contained in the letter of 12 February 2009 whereby the Secretary-General of the European Parliament informed Ms Scheefer, first, that it had not been possible to find any legally acceptable solution to enable her to continue working within the medical service at Luxembourg (Luxembourg) and, secondly, that her temporary staff contract would end on 31 March 2009;

2.orders the European Parliament to pay to Ms Scheefer the difference between, (i) the amount of the remuneration which she would have earned if she had continued to be employed by the Parliament and (ii) the amount of the remuneration, fees, unemployment benefit or any other allowance in lieu which she has in fact received since 1 April 2009 in place of the remuneration which she was receiving as a member of the temporary staff;

3.dismisses the action as to the remainder;

4.orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay those of Ms Scheefer.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 37, 13.2.2010, p. 52.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia