I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-441/08) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Actions for annulment - Decision No 626/2008/EC - Common framework for the selection and authorisation of operators of systems providing mobile satellite services - Absence of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
2010/C 195/28
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ICO Services Ltd (Slough, Berkshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Tupper, Solicitor)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: J. Rodrigues and R. Kaškina, Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Kimberley and F. Florindo Gijón, Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendants: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and A. Nijenhuis, Agents)
Application for annulment of Decision No 626/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2008 on the selection and authorisation of systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) (OJ 2008 L 172, p. 15)
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.ICO Services Ltd shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union.
3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 6, 10.1.2009.