- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-85/20: Action brought on 13 February 2020 — Qx World v EUIPO — Mandelay (EDUCTOR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0085
62020TN0085
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.4.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 114/15
(Case T-85/20)
(2020/C 114/16)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mandelay Kft. (Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark EDUCTOR — European Union trade mark No 12 250 593
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 in Case R 1311/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—alter the contested decision in a way to annul the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution;
—as an alternative, annul both the contested decision and the first instance decision and remit the case to EUIPO’s Cancellation Division for further prosecution.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of essential procedural requirements.