- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-168/13: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2014 — EPAW v Commission (Action for annulment — Legal person governed by private law — Absence of proof of existence in law — Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0168
62013TB0168
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/12
(Case T-168/13)(Action for annulment - Legal person governed by private law - Absence of proof of existence in law - Article 44(5)(a) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Manifest inadmissibility)
2014/C 78/24
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) (represented by: C. Kiss, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by K. Herrmann and P. Oliver, and subsequently by L. Pignatoro Nolin, K. Herrmann and J. Tomkin, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the Communication of 6 June 2012 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, entitled ‘Renewable Energy: a major player in the European energy market’, and of the Commission’s decision of 21 January 2013 rejecting as inadmissible the request made by the applicant for review by the Commission of that communication.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.In addition to bearing its own costs, the European Platform Against Windfarms (EPAW) shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.