- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-302/23, Jarocki: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Katowice – Wschód w Katowicach – Poland) – Marek Jarocki v C. J. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 25 – Electronic signatures – Legal effect and evidential value in legal proceedings – National legislation allowing the lodging with the courts, by electronic means, of procedural documents signed electronically – Need for those courts to have an appropriate ICT system)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0302
62023CA0302
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7144
(Case C-302/23,
Jarocki)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Internal market - Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions - Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 - Article 25 - Electronic signatures - Legal effect and evidential value in legal proceedings - National legislation allowing the lodging with the courts, by electronic means, of procedural documents signed electronically - Need for those courts to have an appropriate ICT system)
(C/2024/7144)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Marek Jarocki
Defendant: C. J.
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(1) and (3) and Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation under which a procedural document cannot be lodged with a court by electronic means and signed electronically unless that court has an appropriate ICT system and the lodging is carried out by means of that system.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7144/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(*1) Language of the case: Polish.