- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-716/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid — Spain) — ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition — Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CB0716
62019CB0716
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/10
(Case C-716/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Final decision of a national competition authority finding a practice restrictive of competition - Scope of the probative value of the facts examined and established - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need to reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 44/14)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: ZA, AZ, BX, CV, DU, ET
Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Productos Petolíferos SA
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 2 de Madrid (Commercial Court No 2, Madrid, Spain) by decision of 29 July 2019 is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: Spanish.
* * *