EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-372/09: Action brought on 21 September 2009 — Visti Beheer BV v OHIM — Meister (GOLD MEISTER)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0372

62009TN0372

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/55

(Case T-372/09)

2009/C 282/104

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Visti Beheer BV (Rotterdam, Nethrerlands) (represented by: A. Herbertz, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Meister + Co. AG (Wollerau, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

Vary the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 26 June 2009 (Case R 1465/2008-1) so that it annuls the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in opposition procedure B 1 134 651 and grants the Community trade mark application No 5 243 209 for the contested goods;

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘GOLD MEISTER’ in respect of goods and services in Classes 3, 14, 16, 35, 37, 40 and 42 (Application No 5 243 209)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Meister + Co. AG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark No 39 534 716 and the Community mark No 2 607 737‘MEISTER’ for goods in Class 14, whereas the opposition is directed solely against the registration for goods in that Class

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as there is no likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia