I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-89/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Structural funds - Financial assistance - M43 Motorway between Szeged and Makó - VAT - Non-eligible expenditure)
2012/C 343/20
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Hungary (represented: initially by J. Fazekas, K. Szíjjártó and M.Z. Fehér, then by M.Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, V. Bottka and A. Steiblytė, agents)
Action for annulment brought against the Commission Decision of 14 December 2009 relating to the major project ‘M43 Motorway between Szeged and Makó’, forming part of the ‘Transport’ operational programme for European Union structural support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund under the ‘Convergence’ objective (CCI 2008HU161PR016)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hungary to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.