- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-766/21: Action brought on 9 December 2021 — Daw v EUIPO — Sapa Building Systems (alpina)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0766
62021TN0766
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 64/30
(Case T-766/21)
(2022/C 64/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A. Haberl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sapa Building Systems SpA (Naviglio, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark alpina — Application for registration No 15 123 342
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 September 2021 in Case R 2198/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order Sapa Building Systems SpA to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 33(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.