Case C-654/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Transport — Directive 2006/126/EC — Driving licences — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 49 — Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties — Driving a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence — Penalties — Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Absence of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0654
62020CB0654
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union
C 368/3
(Case C-654/20)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Transport - Directive 2006/126/EC - Driving licences - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties - Driving a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence - Penalties - Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Absence of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Party to the main criminal proceedings
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Apelativen sad Sofia (Court of Appeal, Sofia, Bulgaria), by decision of 9 November 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.
EurLex Case Law