I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-273/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark LITHOFIX - Earlier national and international word marks LITHOFIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of signs - Similarity of goods - No obligation for an examination to be carried out in relation to all the goods covered by the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2015/C 236/54)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Lithomex ApS (Langeskov, Denmark) (represented by: L. Ullmann, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Bonne, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Glaubrecht Stingel GmbH & Co. KG (Wendlingen, Germany) (represented by: T. Krüger, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 February 2014 (Case R 2280/2012-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Glaubrecht Stingel GmbH & Co. KG and Lithomex ApS.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Lithomex ApS to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.