I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT – Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK – Likelihood of confusion
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2004 (Case R 394/2003-2) concerning the opposition filed by the holder of the national trade mark STENINGE KERAMIK against registration of the Community trade mark STENINGE SLOTT.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Steninge Slott AB
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark STENINGE SLOTT for goods in Class 21
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
National mark STENINGE KERAMIK for goods in the same class
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Refusal of registration
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal allowed
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.