- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-347/23, Zabitoń: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – LB, JL v Getin Noble Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Definition of consumer – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency – Natural person who has acquired a residential property to be leased for consideration)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0347
62023CA0347
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7292
16.12.2024
(Case C-347/23, (1) Zabitoń)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Article 2(b) - Definition of ‘consumer’ - Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency - Natural person who has acquired a residential property to be leased for consideration)
(C/2024/7292)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: LB, JL
Defendant: Getin Noble Bank S.A.
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts
must be interpreted as meaning that a natural person who enters into a mortgage loan agreement in order to finance the purchase of a single residential property to be leased for consideration comes under the concept of ‘consumer’, within the meaning of that provision, where that natural person acts for purposes that are outside his or her trade, business or profession. The mere fact that that natural person seeks to earn income from the management of that property cannot, in itself, lead to the exclusion of that person from the scope of the concept of ‘consumer’, within the meaning of that provision.
—
(1) OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7292/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—