I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/4052)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Bogoljub Karić (Belgrade, Serbia) (represented by: W. Julié, A. Beauchemin, T. Marembert, A. Bass, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/391 of 24 February 2025 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine; (1)
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/386 of 24 February 2025 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine; (2)
—order the Council to pay all costs of the present proceedings.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a breach of the rights of defense and to good administration.
2.Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment:
—the allegations of the statement of reasons are insufficient to justify the listing of the applicant under criterion (b);
—the allegations of the statement of reasons are inaccurate and outdated.
—
(1) Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/391 of 24 February 2025 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/391).
(2) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/386 of 24 February 2025 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine (OJ L, 2025/386).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4052/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—