EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases T-1066/23 to T-1069/23: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2025 – Schweppes International v EUIPO – May (MAY TEA) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative marks MAY TEA – International registration of the earlier figurative marks МАЙСКИЙ – International registration of the earlier word mark МАЙСКИЙ ЧАЙ – Relative ground for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA1066

62023TA1066

February 26, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/2199

22.4.2025

(Joined Cases T-1066/23 to T-1069/23)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative marks MAY TEA - International registration of the earlier figurative marks МАЙСКИЙ - International registration of the earlier word mark МАЙСКИЙ ЧАЙ - Relative ground for invalidity - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(C/2025/2199)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Schweppes International Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Bloret-Pucci, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: May OOO (Fryazino, Russia) (represented by: M. Knitter, lawyer)

Re:

By its actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Cases R 72/2022-1, R 77/2022-1, R 75/2022-1 and R 73/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 August 2023 (Cases R 72/2022-1, R 77/2022-1, R 75/2022-1 and R 73/2022-1);

2.Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

3.Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Schweppes International Ltd in the proceedings before the General Court;

4.Orders May OOO to bear its own costs.

OJ C C/2024/557, 8.1.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2199/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia