I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-199/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Articles 17, 17a, 19 and 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Application for authorisation to disclose documents - Application for authorisation to publish a text - Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities - Inadmissibility of the action at first instance - No act adversely affecting an official - Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure)
2013/C 38/33
Language of the case: German
Appellant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 in Case F-132/07 Strack v Commission (2011) ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 and seeking to have that judgment set aside.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Mr Guido Strack to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders Mr Strack to pay the Civil Service Tribunal EUR 2 000 in order to reimburse part of the costs which that latter had to incur.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.
* * *
Language of the case: German