I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2017/C 424/28)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: L’Oréal (represented by: T. de Haan, P. Péters, lawyers)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Guinot
—set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2017 in Case T-183/16, EU:T:2017:449;
—refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union; and
—reserve the costs; in the alternative, order EUIPO to bear the appellant’s costs in relation both to the appeal and to the proceedings at first instance.
According to the appellant, the General Court distorted the facts and arguments which it had made before it and infringed Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. (<a id="ntc1-C_2017424EN.01001902-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017424EN.01001902-E0001">1</a>)
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 78, p. 1).
—