I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Máximo Poza Poza (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: P. Poza Cisneros, lawyer)
Defendant: Single Resolution Board
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—Take note of the lodging of the action for annulment of the Single Resolution Board’s decision to seize the shares of Banco Popular and give judgment annulling that decision and, in consequence, returning to my client its Popular shares and other capital instruments or, in the alternative, order the payment of compensation corresponding to the net value of its Popular assets as of 22 May 2017, valued at EUR 26675424.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.