- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-453/14: Order of the General Court of 10 September 2015 — Pannonhalmi Főapátság v Parliament (Action for annulment — Petition addressed to the Parliament concerning ownership of Lónyay castle in Rusovce (Slovak Republic) — Petition declared inadmissible — Obligation to state reasons — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0453
62014TB0453
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/28
(Case T-453/14)(*1)
((Action for annulment - Petition addressed to the Parliament concerning ownership of Lónyay castle in Rusovce (Slovak Republic) - Petition declared inadmissible - Obligation to state reasons - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 381/30)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Magyar Bencés Kongregáció Pannonhalmi Főapátság (Pannonhalma, Hungary) (represented by: D. Sobor, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Pospíšilová Padowska and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament of 16 April 2014 whereby that Committee declared the petition presented by the applicant on 26 June 2013 inadmissible on the ground that it did not fall within the sphere of activity of the European Union.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Magyar Bencés Kongregáció Pannonhalmi Főapátság shall pay the costs.
3.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene by the Slovak Republic and by Hungary.
(*1) OJ C 303, 8.9.2014