I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2012/C 89/06
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Administrativen sad — Varna
Applicant: Paltrade EOOD
Defendant: Nachalnik na Mitnicheski punkt — Pristanishte Varna pri Mitnitsa Varna
1.Is the retroactive levy of an anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 of 18 July 2011 permissible, without a customs registration — except for the customs registration of the Single Administrative Document in the BIMIS system — taking place with the registration of the TARIC additional code which is mentioned in Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009?
2.What is, in accordance with recital 18 of Regulation No 966/2010, the appropriate amount for the retroactive levy of an anti-dumping duty during the execution of Regulation No 723/2011?
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 of 18 July 2011 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2011 L 194, p. 6).
Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 29, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EU) No 966/2010 of 27 October 2010 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China by imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not, and making such imports subject to registration (OJ 2010 L 282, p. 29).
* * *