- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-22/11: Action brought on 28 February 2011 — Conticchio v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FN0022
62011FN0022
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.5.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 139/31
(Case F-22/11)
2011/C 139/58
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Rosella Conticchio (Rome, Italy) (represented by: R. Giuffridda and A. Tortora, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
Annulment of the decision relating to the establishment of the applicant’s pension rights in so far as she has been recognised as having a right to the retirement pension for Grade AST7/1, rather than for AST7/2.
Form of order sought
—Annul Decision No R/489/10 issued on 18 November 2010 and notified on 24 November 2010, by which the appointing authority rejected the appeal;
—Grant the applicant a transfer from Grade AST7/1 to Grade AST7/2 with retroactive effect;
—Recalculate the amount of the pension payable to the applicant, increasing it by approximately EUR 170 per month;
—Order the body responsible for payment of the applicant’s pension to refund the amount owing, as calculated from 1 June 2010 until the date of final settlement, together with interest, monetary indexation and statutory entitlements;
—Place the European Commission under an obligation to refund the applicant the sums, not owed, which she will have paid by the time the judgment is delivered in the present case, in relation to the redemption of pension rights;
—Order the Commission to pay the costs.