- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-433/21: Action brought on 16 July 2021 — VITRONIC v EUIPO (Enforcement Trailer)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0433
62021TN0433
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 357/31
(Case T-433/21)
(2021/C 357/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: VITRONIC Dr.-Ing. Stein Bildverarbeitungssysteme GmbH (Wiesbaden, Germany) (represented by: D. Tsoumanis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Enforcement Trailer — Application for registration No 18 281 599
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 May 2021 in Case R 236/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare that the grounds for refusal to register set out in Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 preclude registration only in those Member States in which English is the official language, namely Ireland and Malta;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the General Court and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.