- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-125/14: Order of the General Court of 21 October 2014 — Gappol Marzena Porczyńska v OHIM — Gap (ITM) (GAPPol) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0125
62014TB0125
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 26/33
(Case T-125/14)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 026/42)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Gap (ITM), Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 (Case R 686/2013-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Gap (ITM), Inc. and PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by PP Gappol Marzena Porczyńska and Gap (ITM), Inc.
(1)
OJ C 142, 12.5.2014.