EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-644/22: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2024 – Timchenko and Timchenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list – Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants – Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority – Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures – Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Direct concern – Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Misuse of powers – Power of the Council – Proportionality – Legal certainty)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0644

62022TA0644

September 11, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6432

(Case T-644/22)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicants’ names on the list - Obligation to report funds or economic resources belonging to or owned, held or controlled by the applicants - Obligation to cooperate with the competent national authority - Participation in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent restrictive measures - Article 9(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Direct concern - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Misuse of powers - Power of the Council - Proportionality - Legal certainty)

(C/2024/6432)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko (Geneva, Switzerland), Elena Petrovna Timchenko (Geneva) (represented by: S. Bonifassi, E. Fedorova, T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme, L. Burguin and J. Bastien, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, acting as Agent, and by B. Maingain and A. Vandevelde, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer, C. Giolito, M. Carpus Carcea and L. Puccio, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek, in essence, the annulment of Article 1, point 4, of Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1273 of 21 July 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 194, p. 1), in so far as it amends Article 9 of Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2014 L 78, p. 6) by inserting obligations to report funds and to cooperate with the competent authorities in that regard (Article 9(2) of Regulation No 269/2014, as amended) and by treating a failure to comply with those obligations in the same way as a circumvention of fund-freezing measures (Article 9(3) of Regulation No 269/2014, as amended).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Mr Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Mrs Elena Petrovna Timchenko to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

*

Language of the case: French.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6432/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia