EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Sir Gordon Slynn delivered on 15 January 1987. # Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. # Failure of a State to fulfil its obligations - Directives on intra-Community trade in fresh meat and meat products - Failure to implement directives. # Case 386/85.

ECLI:EU:C:1987:13

61985CC0386

January 15, 1987
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Important legal notice

61985C0386

European Court reports 1987 Page 01061

Opinion of the Advocate-General

My Lords,

In 1980 the Council adopted three directives dealing with health problems and public health policy in intra-Community trade in relation to certain meat and meat products . They were respectively numbered 80/214, 80/1099 and 80/1100 ( Official Journal 1980, L 47, p . 3; L 325, p . 14; L 325, p . 16 ).

It is perhaps of some importance to note that in the second two directives, 80/1099 and 80/1100, the Council stressed that the existence of a particular disease affecting pigs represented a danger for the Community' s stock of pigs and that steps should be taken to ensure that the disease is not spread in the course of trade in pigmeat .

Accordingly, dates were fixed for the implementation of those directives : 80/214 should have been implemented by 31 December 1980, and the other two by 1 July 1981 .

After asking the Italian authorities what had happened by letter dated 22 December 1983, and having not received a reply, the Commission on 7 June 1985 issued a reasoned opinion to the effect that Italy was in breach of its Treaty obligations . Subsequently, the Commission commenced these proceedings .

In its defence, as today before the Court, the Italian Government has pointed out that a draft to implement Directive 80/1099 is before the Parliament and apparently is about to go to the Senate . It seems that there is more delay in preparing the necessary legislation to give effect to Directives 80/214 and 80/1100 .

It is plainly a breach of the Treaty for these directives not to have been implemented in the time-limit fixed by the directives .

In my opinion the Commission is entitled to the declaration it seeks and to its costs against the Italian Government .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia