EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-4/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 6 November 2014 — DH v Parliament (Civil service — Probationary official — Article 34 of the Staff Regulations — Probation report establishing the obvious inadequacy of the probationary official — Extension of the probationary period — Reassignment — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Conditions under which the probationary period progressed — Professional incompetence — Duty of care — Principle of sound administration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0004

62014FA0004

November 6, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.12.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/38

(Case F-4/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Civil service - Probationary official - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Probation report establishing the obvious inadequacy of the probationary official - Extension of the probationary period - Reassignment - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Conditions under which the probationary period progressed - Professional incompetence - Duty of care - Principle of sound administration))

(2014/C 448/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: DH (represented by: A. Salerno and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and M. Ecker, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders DH to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 61, 1/3/2014, p. 22.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia