EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-205/25, Bayerisches Landesamt für Datenschutzaufsicht: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2025 – Joachim Lindenberg v Bayerisches Landesamt für Datenschutzaufsicht

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0205

62025CN0205

March 17, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3035

10.6.2025

(Case C-205/25, Bayerisches Landesamt für Datenschutzaufsicht)

(C/2025/3035)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Joachim Lindenberg

Defendant: Bayerisches Landesamt für Datenschutzaufsicht

Questions referred

Is Article 15 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, read in conjunction with Article 4(7) of Regulation 2016/679, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) to be interpreted as meaning that a supervisory authority, as defined in Article 4(21) of Regulation 2016/679 and acting in the context of a complaint procedure initiated by a data subject pursuant to Article 77 of Regulation 2016/679, is at the same time a ‘controller’ within the meaning of Article 15 of Regulation 2016/679, read in conjunction with Article 4(7) of Regulation 2016/679, and is therefore required to grant the data subject access to information on the basis of Article 15 of Regulation 2016/679?

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Is EU law, in particular Article 23 of Regulation 2016/679, to be interpreted as precluding national legislation – such as Article 20(2) of the Bayerisches Datenschutzgesetz (Bavarian Law on Data Protection), the provision at issue in the main proceedings – which excludes, in a blanket manner, rights of access or inspection with respect to files and records of supervisory authorities as defined in Article 4(21) of Regulation 2016/679?

Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3035/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia