- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-369/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 16 June 2017 — Ahmed Shajin v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0369
62017CN0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.9.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 293/19
(Case C-369/17)
(2017/C 293/22)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ahmed Shajin
Defendant: Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal
Question referred
Does it follow from the expression ‘that he or she has committed a serious crime’ used in Article 17(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, that the penalty provided for a specific crime under the law of the particular Member State may constitute the sole criterion to determine whether the person claiming subsidiary protection may be excluded from it?
*
Language of the case: Hungarian.
(1) OJ 2011 L 337, p. 9.
* * *
(2017/C 293/22)